Week 3: Art and Robots

Blog #3: Art and Robots



Much of this week’s material discusses the dehumanization of workers caused by industrialization. The idea is that as the workers become integrated in with the machinery, each performing one small task to contribute to the greater production goal, they are themselves forming one large machine. There is a negative implication here that they are giving up their humanity to earn a paycheck. 
Factory workers in a production line.
I agree to some extent, but there’s another perspective worth mentioning. Industrialization and machines have greatly decreased the amount of time it takes to accomplish tasks. The National Bureau of Economic Statistics estimates that “women between the ages of 18 and 64 spent 18 fewer hours on housework each week in 2005 than they did in 1900.” Those eighteen hours a week freed up actually means less time spent in the drudgery of work, and more time to create art and pursue passions.
Damage and aging on Mona Lisa.

Walter Benjamin took a different angle, arguing that the mass production and re-production of artwork deprives the reproductions of their uniqueness and changes their “aura.” He says that “even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element: its
presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be.” While I don’t refute this point, I again question whether this is a bad thing. Mass reproduction of art makes that art more readily available to more people, and allows millions the opportunity to be inspired and affected by the art. The uniqueness of the original piece remains intact; its brushstrokes and acquired dings/dents will never be precisely replaced — even if they were, there is something inherently special about it being the original.

Robot from HBO's Westworld.
Another topic that interested me this week was the difference between robots and cyborgs. Robots seem more vilified in our movies because its easier for us to imagine them having evil intentions. Cyborgs are at least part human, so it seems we think we’re able to relate to them better. Westworld, an HBO show, features robots that are so real you cannot tell the difference between them and natural humans. I think once technological gets to this point, it will be a great cause of uneasiness.







Works Cited

Benjamin, Walter. "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction."
(1936). Print.

Gorman, Linda. “Hours Spent in Homemaking Have Changed Little This Century.” The National Bureau of Economic Research, www.nber.org/digest/oct08/w13985.html. Web.

“Mona Lisa Reveals a New Secret?” We Need Art, 15 Dec. 2010, weneedart.wordpress.com/2010/12/14/mona-lisa-reveals-a-new-secret/.

“Triple Forces of Modernity: Industrialism, Nationalism & Imperialism.” Concordia University-Wisconsin History, 5 Apr. 2017, cuwhist.wordpress.com/worldviews-hist-103/triple-forces-of-modernity-industrialism-nationalism-imperialism/.

Vesna, Victoria. Robotics Intro, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. 2012. Video. Youtube. Web.


Watcher, Aether. “Scifi & Cyberpunk.” Pinterest, 22 Nov. 2016, www.pinterest.com/pin/330029478928421846/.

Comments

  1. brontehalliganApril 23, 2018 at 7:10 PM

    Tyler, Super intersting post, I like your inclusion of your own thought and feelings about how you believe there is dehumanisation in the production process. I do agree with you to some extent about the process being more efficient, but it is a shame that we lose the individual uniqueness of products, which is very ironic to me as in todays society we are always aiming to be "individual" in our own selves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Drew PlattApril 25, 2018 at 11:50 AM

    I also really like the way you think that there is dehumanization in the production process. I agree with the fact that you said that when art is mass reproduced it is readily available to the people it gives them the opportunity to be inspired and affected by the art. Love the Westworld picture too. Great post.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Event Blog #1

Image
Event Blog #1 "Spun Chairs" The Tyranny of Consciousness For my first event, I visited the Hammer Museum. It was a unique and awesome experience because of the interesting mix of exhibitions and arrangement of artwork. What initially struck me was the opportunity to interact with the art. There was a permanent exhibition called the “Spun Chairs” which look like kind of like large yarn rollers, but you can sit in them and spin around. There were also ping pong tables that visitors were allowed to use, and an installation called The Tyranny of Consciousness by Charles Atlas. It combines forty four sunsets into one long video with a voiceover by a drag queen called Lady Bunny. It was actually very peaceful and reminded me of Santa Monica. Salome Dancing before Herod I also explored “The Armand Hammer Collection.” This exhibit was interesting to me because it contains many Renaissance-era works of art. A lot of the paintings in this room reminded me of our
Read more

Event Blog #2

Image
         I attended the Fowler Museum on UCLA’s campus for my second event. This is a place I’ve been meaning to visit my entire college career, so this was a great opportunity to finally go. A lot of what I saw at Fowler made me think about the interaction between art and technology, and what we really mean when we label something as a technology. The silver ship        The first exhibit I went to that made me ponder this was “Reflecting    Culture: The Francis E. Fowler, Jr. Collection of Silver.” Right near the  entrance is a plaque discussing the process of turning silver ore into  silverware. It says “art, craft, and business all commingle in the fashioning  of silver, which involves long hours and arduous techniques, acts of  repetition and acts of imagination.” What a wonderful way to describe the  marriage of art and technology and science! The process of turning raw ore  into wonderful pieces of art isn’t something that humans have known how  to do for a particula
Read more

Week 7: Neuroscience and Art

Image
Blog #6: Neuroscience and Art Gall's 27 compartments This week’s topic is neuroscience and art. One of the themes that intrigued me was the prevalence of misinformation (and/or lack of information) on this topic. The brain is such a complex organism that we still don’t understand most of its processes, even though we can replicate some of its functions with neural networks and AI. One result of this knowledge gap, and a natural part of the scientific process, is incorrect theories. An example from the lecture is that of phrenology, presented by Franz Joseph Gall. He divided the brain into 27 specific compartments by function, evaluated people’s abilities by their head shape, and laid the foundation for the idea that intelligence is correlated to brain size. He called each compartment an "organ purposed for a certain faculty." Left brain vs right brain Another example of an incorrect theory is that of the right brain being used for creativity and the left
Read more