Event Blog #2

        I attended the Fowler Museum on UCLA’s campus for my second event. This is a place I’ve been meaning to visit my entire college career, so this was a great opportunity to finally go. A lot of what I saw at Fowler made me think about the interaction between art and technology, and what we really mean when we label something as a technology.
The silver ship


       The first exhibit I went to that made me ponder this was “Reflecting    Culture: The Francis E. Fowler, Jr. Collection of Silver.” Right near the  entrance is a plaque discussing the process of turning silver ore into  silverware. It says “art, craft, and business all commingle in the fashioning  of silver, which involves long hours and arduous techniques, acts of  repetition and acts of imagination.” What a wonderful way to describe the  marriage of art and technology and science! The process of turning raw ore  into wonderful pieces of art isn’t something that humans have known how  to do for a particularly long period of time, and I think that absolutely  qualifies it as a cutting-edge technology. Another representation of this  crossover was a replica ship made out of silver. It was a very detailed  artistic work.
The hollowed gourds used as bowls

The Igbo mask
The next exhibit I went into was “Intersections: World Arts, Local Lives.” Most of the pieces in this exhibit were at one point used for functional purposes, but made in an artistic manner. I think this is really important, and demonstrates the intersection of two worlds; not art and science, but art and utility. The art related to our course in that it actually used a lot of math in its creation. There were hollowed out gourds with perfectly-symmetrical patterns on them. Many of them featured spiral patterns, and considering that natural growth is governed by Fibonacci Numbers, I wouldn’t be surprised if they were present in these pieces. Another piece that demonstrated the use of perspective was a mask made by the Igbo people of Nigeria. Its horns flare outwards at the top, which make it appear larger than it really is.


Overall, this museum didn’t relate super closely to the material we’ve covered in our class. The best representation was between art and technology and math, as demonstrated above. I would recommend this museum to other students for a quick visit.

Me in front of the museum


Kelly, Kevin. "The Third Culture" Science 13 February 1998: Vol. 279 no. 5353 pp. 992-993. Web.

Socioeconomics Institute. "Fibonacci, Fractals and Financial Markets" YouTube, 31 May 2007. Web. <www.youtube.com/watch?v+RE2Lu65XxTU>.

Vesna, Victoria. "Lecture. Medicine pt1." Youtube, 21 Apr. 2012. Web. 25 Oct. 2012. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep0M2bOM9Tk>.

Vesna, Victoria. "Mathematics." Lecture. DESMA 9. Web. <https://cole.uconline.edu/~UCLA-201209-12F-DESMA-9-1#I=Week-2-Assignment/id4287887>.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Event Blog #1

Image
Event Blog #1 "Spun Chairs" The Tyranny of Consciousness For my first event, I visited the Hammer Museum. It was a unique and awesome experience because of the interesting mix of exhibitions and arrangement of artwork. What initially struck me was the opportunity to interact with the art. There was a permanent exhibition called the “Spun Chairs” which look like kind of like large yarn rollers, but you can sit in them and spin around. There were also ping pong tables that visitors were allowed to use, and an installation called The Tyranny of Consciousness by Charles Atlas. It combines forty four sunsets into one long video with a voiceover by a drag queen called Lady Bunny. It was actually very peaceful and reminded me of Santa Monica. Salome Dancing before Herod I also explored “The Armand Hammer Collection.” This exhibit was interesting to me because it contains many Renaissance-era works of art. A lot of the paintings in this room reminded me of our
Read more

Week 7: Neuroscience and Art

Image
Blog #6: Neuroscience and Art Gall's 27 compartments This week’s topic is neuroscience and art. One of the themes that intrigued me was the prevalence of misinformation (and/or lack of information) on this topic. The brain is such a complex organism that we still don’t understand most of its processes, even though we can replicate some of its functions with neural networks and AI. One result of this knowledge gap, and a natural part of the scientific process, is incorrect theories. An example from the lecture is that of phrenology, presented by Franz Joseph Gall. He divided the brain into 27 specific compartments by function, evaluated people’s abilities by their head shape, and laid the foundation for the idea that intelligence is correlated to brain size. He called each compartment an "organ purposed for a certain faculty." Left brain vs right brain Another example of an incorrect theory is that of the right brain being used for creativity and the left
Read more